I can barely recall the hype around the first Sin City
movie as it was so long ago, but I recall it had a lot to do with the
shockingly violent stories, the innovative animation style visuals, and the
stripper who keeps all her clothes on.
The second Sin City: A Dame to Kill For movie did not
come with the same amount of positive hype, and so I went along to it more out
of a sense of obligation to it than any real anticipation of anything good.
And I was not disappointed, if that is the phrase one
should use when not really getting something good when you expect it.
The film had violence and style and good actors and the
like (I have a soft spot for Mickey Rourke and Joseph Gordon Levitt), but it
just feels so… dated. Films like 300
have raised the bar on blending live action with animation; movies like the
Raid have upped the violence ante; and twisted revenge storylines are par for
the course for almost every other television series. So the second Sin City movie really needed to
up the stakes one way or another to be relevant and exciting.
And it failed miserably.
It was probably even a step back from the first film, with only
occasional flashes of fun and excitement in amongst the grimness and the
illogic.
At least Eva Green has a lot of fun, or at least almost
as much fun, as she had in the second 300 film.
Its great to see Mickey Rourke back on the screen too, but he is more
peripheral to other people’s stories than master of his own, so there is no real
opportunity to connect to him. Plus, the
editor made some interesting choices, wrapping the JGL story that takes 48
hours tops around a story with Josh Brolin that takes weeks if not months,
which annoyed me more than anything else.
Overall though, I didn’t come out railing against the film
or particularly upset. I suppose there
wasn’t enough expectation in the film for me really to worry too much about
it. Shame really.
Verdict: Sin City: A Dame to Kill For was decidedly
underwhelming on all fronts. A sequel to
a movie that no one was really crying out for , with weaker stories and no real
innovation. Despite a great cast, the
film really failed to capture my imagination, even if it did capture my
interest from time to time. 5 splashes
of colour out of 10.
No comments:
Post a Comment